Register or Login
  Search
  
 




Part III: Drugs as Prevention?

Parts I and II of this special report explore how crucial low cholesterol is in preventing and managing heart disease. Besides recommending a heart-healthy diet and regular exercise, new federal guidelines are expected to triple the number of Americans that qualify for drug treatment. Among the safest and fastest-acting drugs to lower high cholesterol are statins, but not all experts want to give them -- or other drugs -- to people who don't have heart disease.


By Thomas Maugh III

High cholesterol: Weighing drug therapy

Not everyone is ready to join hands in a statin lovefest. Some experts strongly oppose the suggestion that the drugs be used on an expanding circle of patients -- people without a sign of heart disease, even healthy people with normal cholesterol. Since the early 1990s Thomas B. Newman, a professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of California at San Francisco's school of medicine, has filled medical journals with concerns about anticholesterol medications. His message is simple: People who are healthy and free of heart disease don't need the drugs. "The idea that healthy patients with normal cholesterol need to take statins is both presumptuous and arrogant," he says.

Newman and like-minded scientists feel that cholesterol can be too low. They point to the so-called J curve in mortality, which indicates that death rates are higher in average adult men whose total cholesterol falls below 160. (Some researchers dispute this analysis by asserting that certain diseases produce low cholesterol, not the other way around.) Newman also maintains that no one knows the effect the statins will have on healthy people who take them for decades. "Even if the drugs are safe and effective in the short term, we don't know what will happen if people take them for 10, 20, or 30 years. We may be trading a short-term benefit for unknown long-term risks."

And although statins are considered reasonably safe, they aren't without risks. Studies indicate that they are better tolerated than other cholesterol-lowering drugs, the statins can cause such side effects are mild gastrointestinal disturbances, muscle pain and stiffness, rash, and headache. In some cases they can cause liver damage or serious myopathic disorders such as rhabdomyolysis. One of the drugs, cerivastatin (Baycol), has even been pulled off the market because of reports of muscle destruction linked to 31 deaths in the United States. Statins can also bring about severe problems when combined with certain drugs, including oral anticoagulants, gemfibrozil, erythromycin, niacin, cyclosporine, and certain bloods used to treat high blood pressure.

(If you're a patient and are taking Baycol, your doctor will want to switch you to another cholesterol-lowering drug right away. And if you're on any statin and experience muscle pain, weakness, or tenderness, particularly in your back and calves, or muscle pain combined with weakness, fever, vomiting, or dark urine, get medical help IMMEDIATELY.)

In general, however, statins are safe and effective, according to the American Heart Association. Perhaps a bigger obstacle to them is price. The research company Source Information /PMSI tracked 6,000 patients who began taking statins in September 1996. Six months later, fewer than half were still on the drugs; at 10 months the number had fallen from 30 to 40 percent. The reason cited most often for stopping was cost. (The apparent decline in the cost of LDL-lowering drugs, however, may mean that they'll become available to more patients.)

In addition, other studies suggest that the drugs can save patients money in the long run. One analysis, for instance, found that simivastatin therapy added only 28 cents a day in net costs due to lower hospital charges and associated treatment expenses, says Roger Blumenthal, MD, director of the cardiovascular department at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

The new studies on high cholesterol are a call to action, says prominent cardiologist William Castelli. When he examined the subjects in the recent Air Force trial, for example -- people who had an average LDL of 150 and no history of heart disease -- he didn't see healthy patients. He saw future heart attack victims. "We're living in a terribly dangerous society," Castelli says. "But fortunately we're learning that we have mechanisms to change the risks." The new research has focused attention on the importance of revising therapy goals, he says. "People with an LDL of 150 -- we need to treat them."

He's not the only one who feels that way. Diet and exercise are still the first lines of defense against high cholesterol, but if lifestyle changes don't work, the National Cholesterol Education Project's guidelines recommend that physicians consider drug therapy in the following categories:

People with coronary heart disease or equivalent risks whose LDL cholesterol is 130 or above (Drugs are optional in people with a level of 100 to 129 who can't bring down their cholesterol through lifestyle changes).
People with two or more risk factors for heart disease whose LDL cholesterol is between 130 and 160, depending on how likely the individual is to develop heart disease over a 10-year period.
People with one or no risk factors whose LDL cholesterol is 190 or above (particularly if the one risk factor is smoking). With an LDL level of 160 to 189, drug therapy is optional, says the NCEP.
Overall, doctors should employ a more aggressive treatment of high cholesterol for those with a moderately high or high risk of a heart attack. These at-risk patients should set lower treatment goals for LDL cholesterol and start drug therapy at lower LDL thresholds.

Aggressive treatment is particularly important for patients with a family history of coronary artery disease, says University of Southern California atherosclerosis research director Howard Hodis. "Genes are so important in heart disease. If someone's father had a heart attack at age 50, chances are he will too."

More than a year after his alarming trip to the doctor, Louis Vida is increasingly confident that he can defy such pronouncements. He has good reason to be hopeful. By sticking to a sensible diet and trying to exercise regularly, the auto worker has lowered his weight further. And thanks to this healthier lifestyle and continued statin therapy, his cholesterol levels remain normal.

These results are much more than numbers to Louis Vida, whose father had suffered a disabling heart attack at age 49. When Vida sought medical help, his cholesterol hovered at 299. After a combined diet, exercise, and statin therapy program, the 44-year-old auto worker's cholesterol plummeted and he feels better than he has in recent memory. Perhaps most important, he's looking forward to enjoying years of good health that his father could not.

-- Thomas H. Maugh II is a science writer based in Los Angeles. An earlier version of this story appeared in Hippocrates magazine.

Editor's note: Since this article was published, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) came out with new guidelines in July 2004 recommending statins or other cholesterol-lowering drugs for everyone who is at high risk for a heart attack AND has an LDL or bad cholesterol level above 100 mg/dL. [High-risk is defined as those who have coronary heart disease or diabetes or mulitple risk factors (i.e., smoking, hypertension) that give them a greater than 20 percent chance of having a heart attack within 10 years.] The American Heart Association also came out with new guidelines in February 2004 recommending that ALL women who are at high-risk for heart attacks take statins or other cholesterol-lowering drugs, even if their LDL cholesterol is below 100.



References


National Institutes of Health. "Update on Cholesterol Guidelines: More-Intensive Treatment Options for Higher Risk Patients." July 12, 2004.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. NCEP Report: Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. May 2004. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/atp3upd04.pdf

Our reviewers are members of Consumer Health Interactive's medical advisory board.
To learn more about our writers and editors, click here.

First published May 21, 2001
Last updated October 29, 2007



Home | Medical Info | Cool Tools
Who We Are | Editorial Guidelines | Contact Us | FAQ | Registration | Privacy

All contents copyright © Consumer Health Interactive, a division of Caremark, L.L.C. All rights reserved. Consumer Health Interactive makes this Web site available free to users for the sole purposes of providing educational information on health-related issues and providing access to health-related resources. This Web site's health-related information and resources are not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice or for the care that patients receive from their physicians. Please review the Terms of Use before using this Web site. Your use of this Web site indicates your agreement to be bound by the Terms of Use. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately.

This Web site was produced by
CAREMARK

We subscribe to the HONcode principles of the Health On the Net Foundation
We subscribe to the HONcode principles. Verify here.
URAC Health Web Site Accreditation Seal Editorial Team Medical Review Board
Medical Review Board and Editorial Team

-